Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2023/07/12 7:35:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yes I think it's better if you could proceed with brltty.
Note I pushed a commit earlier today which excludes %{ix86} from the
OCaml subpackage. In OCaml 5 / Fedora 39 we are going to drop support
for this architecture entirely.
- build bumped icu in your side-tag too, so brlapi rebuilt there
would be built both against new icu and new ocaml?
I'm not sure whether or not this is necessary, but in any case don't
worry as I will sort it out when doing the OCaml rebuild.
Rich.
FYI, it seems brltty is failing anyway on i686, with:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103241186 )
Adding limb to CC.
I am not the maintainer of brltty, but just adding "BR: gcc" makes
brltty compile on all arches (against f39):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103255038
I am not sure to what side-tag I should build brltty for now...
(ocaml rebuild first, or ICU rebuild first)
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
