On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FTBFS:
0ad
arbor
CuraEngine
bout++
cachelib
dolphin-emu
folly
freeopcua
gerbera
luxcorerender
mangohud
wasmedge
watchman
I fixed 0ad from that list and built it in the side tag.
I think I will merge this side tag without fmt9 compatibility package
tomorrow.
Why? Now that you've already done all the work of adding the compatibility package, why drop it and break all of the unbuilt packages in rawhide? I don't think any of the packages from the list are release blocking, but it just seems antisocial for rawhide users to break packages they might be using, especially if it's no extra work for you at this point.
Another thing that comes in my mind is that there is the ongoing python rebuild in f39-python and your rebuilt package set probably intersects with it. Would be good to let Miro know what packages they need to rebuild again once your fmt tag is merged.
--
Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
