On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:44 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > >> Well, EL6 ELS support is still available for (around) > >> another year, so it is a nice to have to support those > >> limping along with EL6, but I would generally agree > >> with the principal that if supporting a product past > >> official EOL becomes overly onerous that support > >> should end, or be explicitly funded out of the ELS > >> fees if the ELS community needs that support. > > > > EPEL is not covered by ELS, hence EPEL is already EOL. > > PS: I also do not see why Fedora should be supporting the users of a > commercial subscription scheme with free services such as Copr. > First, let me be clear: I agree with you and Smooge that EPEL 6 should already be dead in COPR. That said, Fedora *itself* is a free service supporting the users of and funded by a commercial subscription offering. No need to support good arguments with flawed ones. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
