Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> Well, EL6 ELS support is still available for (around)
> another year, so it is a nice to have to support those
> limping along with EL6, but I would generally agree
> with the principal that if supporting a product past
> official EOL becomes overly onerous that support
> should end, or be explicitly funded out of the ELS
> fees if the ELS community needs that support.
EPEL is not covered by ELS, hence EPEL is already EOL.
If we are going to support distros that had their EOL 2½ years ago, I want
my Fedora 31 to 36 buildroots back! (Fedora 31 had its EOL only 6 days
before EPEL 6, Fedora 32 to 36 had theirs more recently.)
> I do not consider setting gpgcheck=0 overly
> onerous for EPEL6
I consider it a security risk and a no go.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
