I am also interested in keeping the LO packages in Fedora. Hussein On 6/6/23 20:55, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried under tons of posts. Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos? What it is needed to set up a SIG? A wiki page and a mailing list? And also a FAS group, I suppose? BTW I've already seen a couple of hiccups which needs to be solved: the Bugzilla assignee of libreoffice package on src.fp.o is set to @sbergmann but I suppose it should now be changed to @limb? And, also, libreoffice 7.5.3 failed to build on Fedora Rawhide, so we now have LO 3.5.3 on F38 and LO 3.5.2 on Rawhide. Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
