Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:55:36 +0000
Mattia Verga via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried 
> under tons of posts.
> 
> Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that 
> libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as 
> RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only 
> have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and 
> would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos?

I am surely interested in the RPMs, mainly from the ppc64le (and s390x)
point of view. They are very unlikely to get flatpaks.


		Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux