Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > According to mpb at least: > > mpb? Mass PreBuilder https://gitlab.com/fedora/packager-tools/mass-prebuild > The majority of those packages are maintained by me... so I can't say I thrilled. > I thought ghc 9 was supposed to be okay with static trampolines? MPB uses BuildRequires to collect all packages that *might* be affected by your change. It builds all those packages with and without your change, and lets you know what you broke. In this case, one broke (cjs, since fixed), ten didn't build before my change anyway[*], and the rest were OK. So if your package doesn't already FTBFS, you're good. > Are the results available? MPB uses COPR, so.. "before" builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4.checker/ "after" builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4/ Note: I've done this before, so only look at the builds that are less than a month old. There should be an "after" build for all packages that BuildRequires libffi, and a "before" package for each package that failed to build "after". [*] I'm still investigating these, but usually, it's not related to the change you're making. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
