Re: F39 Proposal: LIBFFI34 static trampolines (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:13 AM DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jens-Ulrik Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
MPB uses BuildRequires to collect all packages that *might* be affected
by your change.  It builds all those packages with and without your
change, and lets you know what you broke.  In this case, one broke (cjs,
since fixed), ten didn't build before my change anyway[*], and the rest
were OK.  So if your package doesn't already FTBFS, you're good.

Okay thanks for the clarification and explanations.
(I got now that by "affected packages" you didn't mean "failed":)

"after" builds:  https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/djdelorie/libffi-3.4.4/

Okay I was already aware of all the ghc failures: mostly due to the new sphinx version in Rawhide
(which I had already fixed for ghc9.4). So it looks fine from my pov so far, thanks.
I have just now pushed fixes for all ghc*, so can you try to rebuild them again in your repo?
Jens
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux