Re: Orphaning despite having maintainers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Right now dogtag-pki is off the hook, nothing shows that it is
'orphan-impacted'. However, for ecj I still get that and it shows
explicit dependency on java-1.8.0-openjdk as well while ecj has
following list of dependencies:
dogtag-pki spec explicitly depends on java-17-openjdk-devel/java-17-openjdk-headless and is no longer showing as orphan-impacted (it was yesterday though?).
The rest of our java packages do not explicitly depend on any JDK, yet show as orphan-impacted directly depending on java-1.8.0-openjdk, which according to the spec is not the case.

On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 at 11:34, Alexander Bokovoy <abokovoy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On to, 27 huhti 2023, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>On 27. 04. 23 12:19, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>The graph in the packager dashboard is showing that resteasy directly
>>depends on java-1.8.0-openjdk which is not true.
>
>resteasy (maintained by: cfu, cipherboy, ckelley, edewata, jmagne,
>mfargett, mharmsen, vakwetu)
>pki-resteasy-client-3.0.26-23.fc38.noarch requires java-1.8.0-headless
>= 1:1.8.0.362.b09-2.fc38
>pki-resteasy-core-3.0.26-23.fc38.noarch requires java-1.8.0-headless =
>1:1.8.0.362.b09-2.fc38
>pki-resteasy-jackson2-provider-3.0.26-23.fc38.noarch requires
>java-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.362.b09-2.fc38

That is not what is in the binary package (spec file does not even have
that dependency _expression_ directly).

Binary package https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=33490808
has the following Requires statement:

(java-headless or java-17-headless or java-11-headless or java-1.8.0-headless)

This library is usable with any supported JDK build.

--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux