Re: F39 proposal: FontAwesome6 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:16 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest
> > versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of
> > updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look.  In addition,
> > many new icons have been added in the 5.x and 6.x versions.  For
> > example, version 6.x contains a Fedora icon, while previous versions
> > do not.
>
> Version 5.x contains an an unauthorized not-so-great single-color hackup of
> the "classic" logo. Version 6.x contains an authorized rendition of the
> legit current logo.
>
> Is 6.x backwards compatible with 5?

Yes, 6.x is backwards compatible with 5.x.  The plan includes retiring
the fontawesome5-fonts package, so that unauthorized not-so-great
single-color hackup will get the boot as part of this change.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux