> Some user-facing applications will be able to display the latest > versions of the FontAwesome icons, which have undergone a number of > updates and cleanups to provide a more pleasing look. In addition, > many new icons have been added in the 5.x and 6.x versions. For > example, version 6.x contains a Fedora icon, while previous versions > do not. Version 5.x contains an an unauthorized not-so-great single-color hackup of the "classic" logo. Version 6.x contains an authorized rendition of the legit current logo. Is 6.x backwards compatible with 5? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
