Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gordon Messmer kirjoitti 23.2.2023 klo 7.34:

In case it helps: I started with the filelist in the "fedora" repo, and a list of all of the deps printed by dnf repoquery that ended with '()(64bit)', which should be a list of all of the ELF dependencies that don't have versioned symbols.  I compared the two to build a list of dependencies that match the prefix of a file in the file list, but not the entire file name (so the dependency "libssl.so.1.1()(64bit)" matches "libssl.so.1.1.1q").

In the "fedora" repo, I can only currently find about 11 dependencies that look like they'd be a symlink to a full name, where the full name suffix isn't a numeric version:

https://paste.centos.org/view/7e996c65 ("odd" full names)

https://paste.centos.org/view/0b26cb00 (the full list)

CentOS paste links don't last very long, so let me know if those expire too quickly.

I only got to this message now. The links did expire too quickly for me.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux