V Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 09:52:03PM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > > > > > > First, the bug. From these results, it looks like rpminspect is only > > > comparing the primary package to the old build. I do see a result for the > > > package "nghttp2", but I don't see an rpminspect result for "libnghttp2". > > > Are sub-packages not tested, or are the results simply not exposed? (Or am > > > I simply missing the path to find them?) > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Should I report those in bugzilla, and if so, against what component? > > I think David prefers <https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect/issues/>. > > > Thanks. I'll file the RFE there. But, with regard to the bug: offhand, if > this is a bug, it seems like a bug in the koji CI scripts and not in > rpminspect, doesn't it? It's not Koji CI. The CI is more bound to Bodhi than to Koji. Though CI people would probably argue that it's a completely independnent beast. > Where would I find the definition of the > "fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis" stage for review? I know about <https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issues/> which I use for reporting issues in Fedora CI. There are more CI trackers on Pagure in fedora-ci name space, but I don't understand the CI internals to give you a more focused answer. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
