On 2023-02-22 02:47, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:48:26AM -0800, Gordon Messmer napsal(a):
First, the bug. From these results, it looks like rpminspect is only
comparing the primary package to the old build. I do see a result for the
package "nghttp2", but I don't see an rpminspect result for "libnghttp2".
Are sub-packages not tested, or are the results simply not exposed? (Or am
I simply missing the path to find them?)
...
Should I report those in bugzilla, and if so, against what component?
I think David prefers <https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect/issues/>.
Thanks. I'll file the RFE there. But, with regard to the bug: offhand,
if this is a bug, it seems like a bug in the koji CI scripts and not in
rpminspect, doesn't it? Where would I find the definition of the
"fedora-ci.koji-build.rpminspect.static-analysis" stage for review?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
