Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-01-03)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/10/23 18:13, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> You've previously indicated that developers should just 'dnf
>> distro-sync' to an alternative Fedora that has frame pointers, as if
>> building two alternate versions of Fedora, one for developers and one
>> for users, is a reasonable thing to do. The cost of this is just too
>> high. We'd need double build infrastructure.
> 
> +100% CPU power for the Koji build farm is still a lot less overall cost 
> than +2.5% CPU power for *all* Fedora users in the entire world.
> 
>         Kevin Kofler

Absolutely correct.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux