On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:47 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 02:44:01 AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos > <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of > > ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not > > from RPM Fusion? > > Hi, it's because RPM Fusion is explicitly designed to provide extra > packages for Fedora, whereas Flathub is not. Apparently Fedora Legal is > now OK with Flathub risk, but not with RPM Fusion risk. So there you > have it. > > Specific packages from RPM Fusion might still be allowed if split into > separate repos that don't provide access to the rest of RPM Fusion, so > that Fedora Legal can review them individually. So far, this has only > been used to allow the NVIDIA driver. Thanks Michael, what a headache. So for RPM Fusion to be included, it would have to change its scope/definition and host a more "varied" suit of packages? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
