Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:59 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 01:33:18 AM +0100, Fabio Valentini
> <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Also, given that it is now apparently considered "allowed" to enable
> > unfiltered flathub with the "Enable third-party repositories" switch,
> > I wonder if that reasoning also applies to the  equivalent situation
> > for RPMFusion repos? The "Enable third-party repositories" switch only
> > enables "filtered" repos (containing only RPMs for proprietary NVidia
> > drivers and the Steam client), so following the same reasoning, it
> > should now be possible to enable "unfiltered" RPMFusion repos with
> > that switch instead, as well?
>
> This is only allowed for RPM Fusion's NVIDIA driver repo.

Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of
ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not
from RPM Fusion?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux