On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 7:34 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnfilteredFlathub > > Note that I am processing this proposal past the deadline because 1. I > think it could reasonably be considered a Self-Contained Change > proposal and 2. the reasons outlined by Mattias in another thread: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/PKUEM64L7FDGQBPRKZTHF5EF5FTLVSXG/ > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > > == Summary == > Fedora Workstation's existing > [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/workstation-working-group/third-party-repos/ > third party repo feature] allows users to enable a selection of > software repos that are hosted by external organizations. This > selection has included a filtered version of Flathub since F35, which > provides access to a small number of Flathub apps. This change would > remove the filtering from our Flathub offering, so that users can > enable a complete version of Flathub using the third party > repositories feature. In the graphical software manager app, Flathub > packages will only be selected by default when no Fedora package is > available. I appreciate the work that will go into making sure that software provided by Fedora will always take priority over third-party flatpaks, thank you for working on that. Also, given that it is now apparently considered "allowed" to enable unfiltered flathub with the "Enable third-party repositories" switch, I wonder if that reasoning also applies to the equivalent situation for RPMFusion repos? The "Enable third-party repositories" switch only enables "filtered" repos (containing only RPMs for proprietary NVidia drivers and the Steam client), so following the same reasoning, it should now be possible to enable "unfiltered" RPMFusion repos with that switch instead, as well? Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
