On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:46 AM Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Do, 22.12.22 06:38, Neal Gompa (ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > I have to think about what happens when the cat is out of the bag. > > What I want is not necessarily a solution to this now, but a > > commitment that someone will actively work on fixing these problems > > *before* proposing the next phase and have it ready *before* making > > any future proposals on UKIs. If you can't do that, I can't in good > > faith consider incrementally supporting UKIs, because there's > > effectively no plan to make them work as a future default way of > > shipping the Linux kernel. > > BTW, you keep talking of "these" problems, and are extremely vague > about those. I think I understood that you hit the NVRAM size limits > before, by enrolling private certs? > Yes. Specifically for dealing with the NVIDIA driver, backports of Intel network card drivers, OpenZFS, ELRepo modules, etc. > What are those issues precisely? Did you file bugs? How many certs did > you try to enroll? Or did you try to enroll hashes? Were was this > dicussed? > Anywhere between 1 to 3 UEFI certs, representing different vendors (machine-local, ELRepo, and OpenZFS). > Without any of that the vagueness just constitutes FUD... Hence, > please be more specific! > You know better than that. Stop it. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
