Re: F38 proposal: Unified Kernel Support Phase 1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Without an initrd we immediately have the following limitations:
> - all kernel modules needed to mount root must be compiled in
> - all that code is always loaded and remains in unswappable memory
> - root= syntax is limited to what the kernel understands, i.e.
>   no root=UUID=… o root=/dev/disk/by-path/… or other udev links,
>   no encryption or dm-verity.
> - no bluetooth keyboards or other fancy peripherals
> - recovery is pretty hard

Also, the security lock-down for the kernel command line means:
- no network root filesystem
- no boot-time-only kernel/module configuration

The idea of switching from grub2 to sd-boot would also drop network boot
and BIOS support.  Supporting boot loaders seems to be a bit of a issue
sometimes, so trying to support multiple boot loaders seems like a bad
idea to me.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux