On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:16:58AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > Without an initrd we immediately have the following limitations: > > - all kernel modules needed to mount root must be compiled in > > - all that code is always loaded and remains in unswappable memory > > - root= syntax is limited to what the kernel understands, i.e. > > no root=UUID=… o root=/dev/disk/by-path/… or other udev links, > > no encryption or dm-verity. > > - no bluetooth keyboards or other fancy peripherals > > - recovery is pretty hard > > Also, the security lock-down for the kernel command line means: > - no network root filesystem > - no boot-time-only kernel/module configuration > > The idea of switching from grub2 to sd-boot would also drop network boot > and BIOS support. Supporting boot loaders seems to be a bit of a issue > sometimes, so trying to support multiple boot loaders seems like a bad > idea to me. The switch to BootLoaderSpec made switching boot loaders *much* easier. The actual boot loader config is fixed and never touched, kernel updates add/remove BLS config snippets, and all boot loaders handle that just fine. You can even have *two* bootloaders, sd-boot for efi mode and grub2 for bios mode. take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
