On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 10:17 AM Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/6/22 8:31 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > There's a very important difference between September 2017 and now: we > > know someone else already did it! > > Great. Good luck. > > > As an aside: I don't appreciate the "high horse" comment, considering > > during most of this discussion, I was doing the work and evaluating > > things. > > It's unfortunate you feel this way. Maybe we cannot work together. > I don't think that's the case. The point I'm making is that I'm not speaking from a point of arrogance, but trying to speak from the ideals of what we're supposed to do, while simultaneously trying to actually execute on that to demonstrate that I'm willing to help to make it happen. Most of the complaints from Sergio and you seem to be centered on doing it alone and taking on the entire workload yourselves, but that is not a requirement at all. I spent a chunk of my Sunday adapting the ImageMagick packaging, building an ImageMagick6 package, and rebuilding packages from Dist-Git in COPR against ImageMagick 7 to figure out what the scope of things are. I truly think that transitioning to ImageMagick 7 for the majority of packages is a lot less difficult than it was back when it was tried in 2017. And dragging our feet on this isn't going to help anything. The ImageMagick 6 website itself states the recommendation to move to ImageMagick 7 now: > As ImageMagick version 6 is no longer being evolved, we recommend you switch to ImageMagick version 7. In the mean-time we continue to support and add security patches, but not evolve, ImageMagick version 6, until at least August 1, 2030. Yes, the EOL period is further out, but I'd rather make it so that the next RHEL will have ImageMagick 7 right from the beginning. And in EPEL 9, there's one package that needs a patch to build against ImageMagick 7 if we wanted to make that bump and ship the ImageMagick6 compat package there like I propose we do for Fedora. -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue