On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 11:55, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new package
> > > with
> > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only ImageMagick
> > > 7,
> > > we move the sources from ImageMagick7 to ImageMagick
> >
> > I think it would be better to update the ImageMagick package to
> > version
> > 7 and create a compatibility package ImageMagick6.
>
> Anyone is going to review the package or not ?
>
> I already explain the situation in the other emails on this thread .
>
> I estimate that I will need about 200 hours to do what your brilliants
> minds ask .
>
Really? "200 hours"? Not a chance. Upgrading ImageMagick to v7 and
Patches please, Neal to help Sergio cut it down then. He is saying he needs that time to make it work for all the problems he is seeing. Your commentary and others are coming across as lambasting him when he is wanting help. While your and other comments seem clear to you.. code would be clearer.
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
