On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 5:07 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 14:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 9:39 AM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 11:55, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 11:25 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 03/12/2022 00:30, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > > The proposal now is to keep ImageMagick 6 and make a new > > > > > > > package > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > ImageMagick 7 , when we have all applications use only > > > > > > > ImageMagick > > > > > > > 7, > > > > > > > we move the sources from ImageMagick7 to ImageMagick > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it would be better to update the ImageMagick package > > > > > > to > > > > > > version > > > > > > 7 and create a compatibility package ImageMagick6. > > > > > > > > > > Anyone is going to review the package or not ? > > > > > > > > > > I already explain the situation in the other emails on this > > > > > thread . > > > > > > > > > > I estimate that I will need about 200 hours to do what your > > > > > brilliants > > > > > minds ask . > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? "200 hours"? Not a chance. Upgrading ImageMagick to v7 > > > > and > > > > > > > > > Patches please, Neal to help Sergio cut it down then. He is saying > > > he needs that time to make it work for all the problems he is > > > seeing. Your commentary and others are coming across as lambasting > > > him when he is wanting help. While your and other comments seem > > > clear to you.. code would be clearer. > > > > > > > Sure. I've prepared a pull request for ImageMagick itself: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ImageMagick/pull-request/10 > > > > And I'm preparing a COPR to rebuild the reverse dependencies and work > > through the breakages (if any): > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/ > > I already state why I against this approach , don't forget, before > merge this PR, you need do the compat-ImageMagick6912 or something, > like [1] > Sure, an ImageMagick6 package as a compatibility package is easy enough to do. > And this will delay a lot adding ImageMagick7 to epel9 and epel8 > No, it wouldn't. You could upgrade ImageMagick and add the ImageMagick6 compat package there too and be fully compliant without extra effort. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
