On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 10:06 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 6:32 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Final statement, instead of wasting my time and energy on arguments, >> Imagemagick7 could already be built on rawhide if someone had done the >> package review for me > > > I understand the sentiment as another person who has donated 1000s of hours to packaging on Fedora, but the "default" package SHOULD be the current latest package. It' just part of "Fedora First". > > So my vote (as much as it matters) is that all packages should be built with the latest version in COPR to verify compatibility, and the ones that don't, build with an ImageMagik 6 compat package. > I've got this mostly worked out now: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/ There are five failures: * autotrace - plan to notify upstream * dvdauthor - point to GraphicsMagick or IM6, plan to notify upstream * q - dead upstream, planned to point to IM6 * vdr-skinnopacity - current upstream dead, plan to notify new upstream * vdr-tvguide - plan to notify upstream I've got an IM6 compat package made (forked from current IM): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/ImageMagick7-dev/build/5081492/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
