On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:03 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10. 10. 22 16:32, Ben Cotton wrote: > > For the last 20 years or so, RPM has used a home-grown OpenPGP parser > > for dealing with keys and signatures. That parser is rather infamous > > for its limitations and flaws, and especially in recent years has > > proven a significant burden to RPM development. In order to improve > > security and free developer resources for dealing with RPM's "core > > business" instead, RPM upstream is in the process of deprecating the > > internal parser in favor of [https://sequoia-pgp.org/ Sequoia PGP] > > based solution written in Rust. > > At this point the change is mostly invisible in normal daily use. > > Which of the following will happen: > > 1) rpm will gain ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches} > 2) we will stop requiring the above in Rust packages, as Rust is 100% available > 3) rpm will %ifarch %{rust_arches} this change > 4) something else (what?) > > IMHO if we do 1) we could as well do 2) because without rpm, we won't be able > to build rpms. 3) seems somewhat tedious for no good reason. I think 2) would be the easiest solution in the long term. rustc and LLVM now already support all targets that we *might* want to add in the near-to-mid-future (riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu comes to mind - its support is at the same level as other targets we already have). Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
