On 20. 10. 22 12:11, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Which of the following will happen: 1) rpm will gain ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches} 2) we will stop requiring the above in Rust packages, as Rust is 100% available 3) rpm will %ifarch %{rust_arches} this change 4) something else (what?) IMHO if we do 1) we could as well do 2) because without rpm, we won't be able to build rpms. 3) seems somewhat tedious for no good reason.I think 2) would be the easiest solution in the long term. rustc and LLVM now already support all targets that we*might* want to add in the near-to-mid-future (riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu comes to mind - its support is at the same level as other targets we already have).
I've opened https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1220 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
