Re: Copr delete-by-default expiration policy still unacceptable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 3:56 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:04 AM Gary Buhrmaster
> <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 2:25 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Would you be willing to pay for that feature?
> >
> > A "freemium" COPR service?
> >
> > I suspect that that would be such a
> > niche service that the cost per user
> > (to pay for the overheads to create
> > and maintain it) would not be
> > acceptable to anyone.
>
> I find that statement to be... ironic.  We're already running a free
> COPR service and paying for the overhead to create and maintain it.

I was talking about adding the "freemium"
paid service, which means being able to
charge users.  Adding in the various payment
processing options (and terminating service
when payment ends) is typically complex.
Real money changes everything.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux