On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:51:55AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 08:26 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:01:13AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 22:49 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 22:39 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 09:08 +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:42:42 +0000 > > > > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So… we certainly don't want people having to declare > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > dependency > > > > > > > > > manually everywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The packaging guidelines seem to say that the manual > > > > > > > > dependency > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > required, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, you need *some* dependency. But opencryptoki has > > > > > > > BR:systemd-devel, and systemd-devel has R:systemd, which > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > Requires(meta) under discussion. So an explicit BR:systemd- > > > > > > > rpm- > > > > > > > macros > > > > > > > should be redundant. > > > > > > > > > > > > the BR: systemd-devel in opencryptoki might be just a > > > > > > historical > > > > > > relict, because it used to be required to define the various > > > > > > macros > > > > > > (IIRC) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today clamav fails to build on rawhide again, this time because > > > > > make > > > > > install on mock doesn't install systemd files ! > > > > > > > > > > > > scratch build > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92286295 > > > > > > > > > systemd-devel no longer has systemd dependency on F37+, now we also > > > need BuildRequires: systemd > > > > I don't expect clamav needs systemd to build. It probably needs > > systemd-devel and systemd-rpm-macros. > > > > It is true that systemd-devel used to pull in systemd. It was > > something > > of an accident: systemd-devel had an artificial dependency on > > systemd-pam, > > which in turn had a dependency on systemd. The artificial dep was > > added > > to make system-pam a multiarch package. At some point this was solved > > properly > > and and hack was dropped. I don't think we want systemd-devel to > > R:systemd. > > systemd-devel is about various headers and libraries, and the systemd > > runtime is a separate thing. > > > > I now pushed a commit to add in systemd-devel: > > > > Requires(meta): (%{name}-rpm-macros = %{version}-%{release} if rpm- > > build) > > > > This means we'll get systemd-rpm-macros in rpm buildroot if systemd- > > devel > > is installed. We had the same line on systemd itself. This way one > > doesn't > > need to explicitly BR:systemd-rpm-macros is either BR:systemd or > > BR:systemd-devel > > is specified. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clamav/c/35d73944ae2fa9cee3df4729c53a66ba03595d7f > "Add missing dependency on systemd as it's the systemd package itself > that ships systemd.pc, not systemd-devel." > > because clamav runs `pkg-config --variable=systemdsystemunitdir > systemd` which needs /usr/share/pkgconfig/systemd.pc Ah, OK. Thanks for the correction. In this case, it's fine for clamav to BR:systemd. An alternative approach would be to use rpm macros instead of pkg-config: %_unitdir gives the same string. > and /usr/share/pkgconfig/systemd.pc is systemd (core) sub-package , > maybe I would suggest move /usr/share/pkgconfig/systemd.pc and > /usr/share/pkgconfig/udev.pc to devel sub-package That'd cause too much confusion. systemd-devel has libsystemd.pc already, and -devel is about libraries. We had the rule that 'pkgconfig(systemd)' gives you full systemd package, and I think we should not change that. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
