Re: Explicit dependency on systemd-rpm-macros now required?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 03:35:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> 
> > So… we certainly don't want people having to declare the dependency
> > manually everywhere.
> 
> The packaging guidelines seem to say that the manual dependency is
> required, though.

Yeah, you need *some* dependency. But opencryptoki has
BR:systemd-devel, and systemd-devel has R:systemd, which has the
Requires(meta) under discussion. So an explicit BR:systemd-rpm-macros
should be redundant.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux