On Wed, Sep 28 2022 at 06:49:42 AM +0000, Tommy Nguyen
<remyabel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With a single maintainer introducing a ffmpeg-free binary packages
into Fedora, competing with our fully featured ffmpeg build, this
leads to various conflicts and interactions issues. While one could
admittedly rejoice from the ffmpeg introduction intro Fedora
(enabling ffmpeg support for some fedora package lacking it), the
method used to forcibly introduced an un-backed (by most RPM Fusion
packager involved) package with uncertain features enabled, was
perceived as unfriendly for the least. A determining argument for
any "new eyes" is the very short time the Fedora review took
compared with a fully backed 6 months Fedora feature review
process.
Just for avoidance of doubt, getting ffmpeg into Fedora was a priority
for the Workstation Working Group, and Neal was working in coordination
with us on that. We want to provide as much multimedia in Fedora as we
legally can without requiring that users resort to third-party
repositories.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
