On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:50 AM Tommy Nguyen <remyabel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 08:40 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:38 AM Tommy Nguyen <remyabel@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 08:24 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > As one of the ffmpeg maintainers, I'm actively working on > > > > workarounds > > > > for the problem. And I've talked to my counterparts in RPM Fusion > > > > about the issue as well. We're all trying to figure this out. > > > > > > That seems to contradict this quote from > > > https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/linux-graphics-x-org-drivers/opengl-vulkan-mesa-gallium3d/1321663-mesa-can-now-be-built-with-select-video-codecs-disabled-for-software-patent-concerns?p=1322191#post1322191 > > > : > > > > > > > There is little to no interest at rpmfusion to package and > > > > maintain > > > it, also keeping the repo in sync with fedora isn't a priority for > > > me. > > > > I am not talking about Mesa, but ffmpeg instead. > > > > Insofar as the Mesa situation, the comment *right below* that one > > explains the situation quite well: > > https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/linux-graphics-x-org-drivers/opengl-vulkan-mesa-gallium3d/1321663-mesa-can-now-be-built-with-select-video-codecs-disabled-for-software-patent-concerns?p=1322383#post1322383 > > > > > > -- > > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > > Does this imply that this section[1] is no longer accurate? > > With a single maintainer introducing a ffmpeg-free binary packages > into Fedora, competing with our fully featured ffmpeg build, this > leads to various conflicts and interactions issues. While one could > admittedly rejoice from the ffmpeg introduction intro Fedora > (enabling ffmpeg support for some fedora package lacking it), the > method used to forcibly introduced an un-backed (by most RPM Fusion > packager involved) package with uncertain features enabled, was > perceived as unfriendly for the least. A determining argument for > any "new eyes" is the very short time the Fedora review took > compared with a fully backed 6 months Fedora feature review process. > > Having non-competing packages in fedora+rpmfusion repositories is > not a side thing, this is the reason why the RPM Fusion projects was > created in the first place. Because of that we cannot afford support > for ffmpeg-free at all and will recommend to migrate to our fully > featured version. > > Fedora Workaround: > > sudo dnf swap ffmpeg-free ffmpeg --allowerasing > It's being worked on, but hopefully in F38+ (and maybe in F37), it will no longer be true. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
