Re: WebKitGTK package naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Being different than other distros is most confusing of all!

I have to disagree with that blanket assertion.

E.g., I believe it would have been much more confusing for our users if we 
had shipped kdelibs 3.5.x as kdelibs4 (or "kdelibs4c2a" as Debian actually 
called it, because they also handled a libstdc++ soname bump in a totally 
weird way) rather than kdelibs3 as we did.

I believe version numbers should be human-readable, not reflect the internal 
soname when they differ, even if that means we use a different package name 
than distributions like Debian stubbornly sticking to soname-based 
versioning.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux