Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/09/2022 10:33, Tommy Nguyen wrote:
I cannot think of any reason why 2FA would be illegal in any country
when TOTP is based on HMAC and by default uses SHA-1.

In some countries (eg. Russia, China) all cryptographic devices must be certified by local government security service.

Further if I may offer my unsolicited opinion, I am strongly in favor
in requiring 2FA.

Who will pay for these devices? Red Hat? Gnome Foundation? Most maintainers won't be happy to spend $50 on a hobby project.

There's been too many supply chain incidents (see npm, github, any
corporate data breach, et al.) that I think Fedora would benefit from
mandating 2FA.

For 15 years, there hasn't been a single incident with Fedora.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux