Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No replying to anyone in particular so no quoting...

I've mentioned this before for the packager CLA in general before but it got no response....

Is it that big of a deal to require some sort of practical affirmation on an annual basis? It could be completely automated. 

Am I way off base here?

It's as simple as an email with a link, "Do you want to continue being a packager (or proven packager) and agree to abide by <insert requirements here>?"

Why was it decided that CLA should be once and done forever?

Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux