On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 04:25:28PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:38 PM Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 01.09.22 17:18, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I'd like to unify fltk but there are a couple of things I'm still > > > unclear about... > > > > > > 1. If I build the x86_64 package locally via fedpkg or mock, will it > > > build both the linux and mingw artifacts by default? > > Unless you have any specific %ifarch etc, yes. > > > 2. Since mingw packages are considered "noarch" in infrastructure, I > > > assume there's some magic to prevent arches other than x86_64 from > > > attempting to build the mingw packages? > > Not really, but if builders on separate arches produce different > > artifacts for the noarch packages, the build will fail with a > > corresponding message like "package XXX built differently on arches YYY" > > > > Let me rephrase, is the mingw package going to be built on ALL arches with > the expectation that they are the same (like -data packages)? If so, that > seems like a huge waste of resources. If looking at a single package in isolation it may look wasteful, but from the POV of the distro as a whole packages with potential mingw sub-RPMs are a small subset of what goes through koji every day. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
