On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:49 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:13:18PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > > > Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm > > planning to start merging native and mingw packages. Initially, I'll be > > looking at these packages where I maintain both variants: > > I've done the same with all the mingw packages I maintained just > before Fedora 37 branched. So the following native packages now > just contain mingw sub-RPMs: > > libvirt, libvirt-glib, libosinfo, osinfo-db, osinfo-db-tools, gtk-vnc > > I'm so happy to have reduced this maint burden. I see a few new mingw > packages pending in package review and think it'd be nice to first ask > the native maintainer to consider unified package, before we approve > any new separate mingw packages. > > Our Mingw packaging guidelines, however, exclusively describe fully > separated mingw packages. So if I suggest this to a native package > maintainer who is not already familiar with mingw, they would be > right to question whether this is a desirable thing. > > IOW, I think we need to look at getting the mingw packaging docs > updated to promote unified packaging as an officially supported > (and even preferred) option, alongside separate packaging. Sounds great. The Packaging Committee is looking forward to your PR ;) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
