Daniel Roesen <dr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > I won't waste hours on writing a patch that gets just ignored. Too bad for you that that is /exactly/ what fuels open source... many people proposing patches, very few getting ever included is what gave you the system you are currently enjoying. Humm... just go out and find out what all what you get here would cost you in propietary stuff. See you get it in exchange for exactly the kind of work you are complaining about, check how many hours of "wasted patch writing" you owe Fedora, and come back when you've paid up. > I don't > have this surplus time. My only chance to influence things is to bring > up my arguments. Ever heard the phrase "Code talks, bullshit walks"? > All else gets decided by Red Hat or "upstream" anyway > (and "upstream" can be overridden by Red Hat again if they like... if > RED HAT likes, not the community). And Red Hat can be overridden by the community, or just abandoned for something else. Your point being? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
