On 23. 08. 22 23:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
even if the advice is: "yes, retire the packages, rather than leave them broken, they can be added back once they have been fixed"
Knowing nothing about Pantheon or GObject C, I do think this is always better than noninstallable packages. So if all other efforts fail, I would retire the packages before Final Freeze and only introduce them back if ever fixed.
Yes, it may be emotionally a bit painful, but IMHO it gives a clearer message to our users if the package is missing rather than utterly broken.
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
