Am 31.07.22 um 18:57 schrieb Richard Fontana:
There are so few non-legacy, today-commonly-used,
generally-accepted-as-FOSS licenses that are not viewed as
GPLv3-compatible that I think it might be better for Ansible to just
list those (the only one I can think of is EPL-2.0), or to list a
small set of recommended/acceptable commonly-used FOSS licenses.
I do not agree with this view and consider this decision not to be helpful.
These licenses might not be "commonly used", but if they are used, these
are the controversal ones, that need to be looked into, exactly because
they "not commonly used".
Provocant question: Do you want contributors to contact redhat-legal in
such cases, as we were required to do in the early days of Fedora?
To me, this reads as a pretty nasty regression in Fedora's workflow,
which should be reconsidered/reverted.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
