Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Fontana wrote:
> But also even license compatibility issues isolated to a particular
> package have mostly been ignored or treated as unimportant for a variety
> of practical, policy, interpretive and doctrinal reasons that are really
> not specific to Fedora but found in other LInux distributions and in
> upstream projects generally.

With at least one notable exception:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#cdrtools

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux