Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/07/2022 20:42, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Provocant question: Do you want contributors to contact redhat-legal in such cases, as we were required to do in the early days of Fedora?

To me, this reads as a pretty nasty regression in Fedora's workflow, which should be reconsidered/reverted.

+1. I'm not going to contact RH's Legal, because they didn't answer my previous question about RPM Fusion.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux