* Fabio Valentini: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Christian Hergert <chergert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > So it looks like what you folks are doing is actually very similar to what >> > Facebook is doing. That is interesting, and explains why some GNOME >> > developers are jumping on the bandwagon of this Change proposal. >> >> To be fair, we've been complaining about it internally in GNOME for probably around a decade. So it's not a new thing from our standpoint. What is new is that it appears others came to the similar-in-spirit solutions. > > Coming at this problem from a different angle, just a hypothetical: > Would it be acceptable to add -fno-omit-frame-pointer and > -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer to the default compiler flags on RHEL? It seems unlikely. Given typical hardware replacement cycles, hardware-assisted backtrace without severe limitations will be widely available soon, and it should have even less overhead than frame-pointer traversal. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
