Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I really don't think encoding lifecycle information in the > installation itself is the right approach, but it's perhaps the most > tenable one for Fedora. However, until Fedora definitively moves to > using independent lifecycles for their releases, this is a game of > whack-a-mole. We've had this challenge for Amazon Linux as well, and thus our approaches (detailed in other mail) have been to always point to a URL for more up to date information, along with explanatory text to cover different possible phases of support. SuSE has some of this metadata already, but it is very SuSE specific when I looked and we couldn't directly re-use it. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
