Re: Do we need a change proposal for this?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03. 07. 22 13:00, Fabio Valentini wrote:
- Go binaries that are used by non-Go packages.
Those (and all their dependencies) would need to stay, unless those
non-Go packages would also stop building on i686.
This includes both build-time and run-time dependencies.
Or, if the package in question is noarch, you'd need to make sure that
it's not ever built on a i686 build host, and doesn't use the
functionality provided by the Go binary at runtime.

An example:

act (Go) -> lib3mf (C/C++) -> openscad (C++)

Here, you cannot simply drop i686 from act, you would need to ExcludeArch: %{ix86} from openscad (I've already done that), lib3mf (on my TODO), act. In this order.

So simply dropping i686 from %golang_arches is not a thing that has no impact.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux