On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 18:17 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Dimi Paun wrote:
> >Very smart. It seems that _anything_ is pointless to discuss here.
> >
> GNOME development decisions shouldnt be discussed here.
Most of the little changes I did are matter of default settings, not of
general development. So they definitely do fit here.
> Fedora development as a distribution and only that
And bad defaults are what?
I see a dangerous circular reasoning here:
1. gah... I have this problem
2. complain upstream
1 (now in upstream). gah... I have this problem
3. complain to your distribution (sometimes even 2. joins the fray,
some even add childish comments like "that's crack *")
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
