On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 02:07:54PM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > #2794 F37 Change proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree > > #libraries and with static stdc++lib > > APPROVED: FESCo approves the use of bundled libraries and static libstdc++ > > for building Java (+5, 1, -0) > > WTF, why??? > > The feedback in the mailing list thread was overwhelmingly negative. We have > brought up several strong reasons why doing this is a horribly bad idea. Why > have those arguments and the mailing list consensus not been considered by > FESCo? The whole proposal consists of a few parts. The part that was voted on was the first part. Various people opposed the whole proposal, but it was the later parts that raised the stronger opposition. The first part is something that is really within maintainer discretion, and has no impact on other packages. If the maintainer thinks that this will make it easier for them to deliver the package in this form, I don't think FESCo should block it. At least that's my motivation; for the whole discussion see the logs [*]. It certainly is not true that the feedback was not considered by FESCo: there was a long discussion on IRC, and FESCo members also participated in the mailing list thread. Zbyszek [*] I wanted to link to meetbot here, but I can't get the new version to cooperate. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
