On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 15:59 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:31:34AM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:35:15PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > > > On 07/06/2022 17:31, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/HYBZLG2X2G6GJKAE5VAK6UHQ4B3GNAJS/ > > > There is no real answer there. > > > > The differences outlined there result in different constraints. > > > It would be great to expand this explanation. > > I guess the problem for Fedora is not the existence of FlatHub and > RPM Fusion. > The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora. If Fedora linked > to RPM > Fusion, then according some (U.S.) jurisdical frameworks Fedora and > RPM Fusion > would form a unit and Fedora would become legally responsible for RPM > Fusion. makes sense to me > It's similar to various, e.g. antibribery and antitrust, acts which > makes you > responsible for deeds proxied to "third-party" entities which > effectively act > for your profit. It does not matter how much dispersed they are. The > important > thing is that they act in accord. But that's only my laic theory. > Maybe I'm > wrong and I only don't understand it. -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
