V Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:31:34AM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:35:15PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 07/06/2022 17:31, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/HYBZLG2X2G6GJKAE5VAK6UHQ4B3GNAJS/ > > There is no real answer there. > > The differences outlined there result in different constraints. > It would be great to expand this explanation. I guess the problem for Fedora is not the existence of FlatHub and RPM Fusion. The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora. If Fedora linked to RPM Fusion, then according some (U.S.) jurisdical frameworks Fedora and RPM Fusion would form a unit and Fedora would become legally responsible for RPM Fusion. It's similar to various, e.g. antibribery and antitrust, acts which makes you responsible for deeds proxied to "third-party" entities which effectively act for your profit. It does not matter how much dispersed they are. The important thing is that they act in accord. But that's only my laic theory. Maybe I'm wrong and I only don't understand it. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
