Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > An unfiltered version has recently been approved[1]. > > [1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/300 I agree with the RPM Fusion developers that this is an absolutely ridiculous double standard, especially with statements like "and we retire Fedora flatpaks that would benefit from unrestricted multimedia codecs available on flathub (specifically Firefox and Totem)". I really do not see why doing that with Flathub is OK and not with RPM Fusion. The user experience from Flathub is much worse because the packages are not in our native format, and because there are no rules at all on how and from what source code they are built. Anyone can upload any binary blob to Flathub. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
